Contact Us for a Free Consultation 914-371-3600

Blog

Attorney Andrew Barovick Judges Student Trial Advocacy Competition

Posted by Andrew J. Barovick | Jan 25, 2017 | 0 Comments

Attorney and trial advocacy instructor Andrew Barovick recently volunteered to be one of several scoring judges for the first qualifying round of the 2016 New York Regional National Student Trial Advocacy Competition (STAC), sponsored on a national scale by the American Association for Justice (AAJ). The purpose of the competition is to provide trial advocacy training to law students. STAC teams present evidence and argue their cases before volunteer judges, such as Barovick.

“Being a scoring judge at this important competition for future lawyers left me feeling that I contributed something valuable to the profession on a pro bono basis,” said Barovick. “I hope that the law students benefitted from my own trial experience, as I know I did when I participated in similar programs when I was in law school.”

Barovick's role, as he wrote in a recent blog entitled “Going Back to School for an Afternoon was Good for Me,” was twofold: he was to act as a juror, but to also score the students on each major task. It was a Dram Shop Act case, in which bars can be held liable for injuries to a third party that stem from the intoxication of an individual served by the bar. The plaintiff was the young person injured when a patron of the bar crashed his car into hers. The defendant was the bar. One school represented the plaintiff, and the other represented the defendant. Each team made an opening statement, did a direct exam of its lay witness and expert witness, crossed their opponent's lay witness and expert witness and delivered summations.

“I had to grade each team's attorney on each task performed, on a scale of 1-10, and monitor the time of the side to which I was assigned (the defendant) as each team had 80 minutes in total to present its case,” said Barovick. “I think it is important because making the leap from classroom to courtroom provokes a lot of anxiety, and any experience that provides law students with a preview of courtroom practice is very valuable, and hopefully educational.”

About the Author

Andrew J. Barovick

Mr. Barovick is a graduate of Columbia College and Cardozo School of Law. He began his legal career at the Queens District Attorney’s Office, where he tried over 20 felonies to verdict, and argued an equal number of appeals before the Appellate Division, Second Department, the New York Court of Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

REPRESENTATIVE VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS:

$7.9 million dollars for infant client who suffered severe brain injuries due to post- delivery medical malpractice.

$500,000 wrongful death/medical malpractice settlement on behalf of patient brought to hospital emergency room with serious injuries who suffered complications while unmonitored and died.

$425,000 wrongful death/medical malpractice settlement during trial on behalf of senior hospital patient whose surgeon failed to timely address her worsening symptoms, resulting in her death.

$250,000 to young man whose physician failed to diagnose an impending torsion testicle, causing the loss of the affected testicle.

$200,000 to young mother whose OB/GYN failed to timely diagnose and treat her ectopic pregnancy, resulting in excruciating, long-term pain and the need for surgery to address the ectopic pregnancy once it was diagnosed.

Menu