Contact Us for a Free Consultation 914-371-3600

Blog

Third Dept.’s Application of Arons v. Jutkowitz Results in New Trial for Plaintiff

Posted by Andrew J. Barovick | Jan 26, 2009 | 0 Comments

In a case decided on January 22, 2009, the Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed the trial court's granting of plaintiff's motion to set aside a defense verdict, based on defense counsel's violation of the principles of Arons v. Jutkowitz and HIPAA.  The case is Straub v. Yalamanchili .  H/Ts to Matthew Lerner and Nicole Black , each of whom posted about it on their respective blawgs.

The Third Department noted that defense counsel had engaged in ex parte conversations with two subsequent treating physicians during the trial, but had not obtained plaintiff's authorization through HIPAA.  Plaintiff's counsel was surprised by the testimony defense counsel presented as a result of the conversations, and was unprepared to rebut it. 

Citing to Arons and to Kish v. Graham , 40 A.D.3d 118 (2007), rev'd 9 N.Y.3d 393 (2007), the Court found that “[t]his was in clear violation of the law in effect at the time of trial…and plaintiff's counsel did not discover it until that time.”  Because the testimony presented by defense counsel was “clearly prejudicial to plaintiff's case,”  the Court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court when it set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial in the interest of justice.

About the Author

Andrew J. Barovick

Mr. Barovick is a graduate of Columbia College and Cardozo School of Law. He began his legal career at the Queens District Attorney’s Office, where he tried over 20 felonies to verdict, and argued an equal number of appeals before the Appellate Division, Second Department, the New York Court of Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

REPRESENTATIVE VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS:

$7.9 million dollars for infant client who suffered severe brain injuries due to post- delivery medical malpractice.

$500,000 wrongful death/medical malpractice settlement on behalf of patient brought to hospital emergency room with serious injuries who suffered complications while unmonitored and died.

$425,000 wrongful death/medical malpractice settlement during trial on behalf of senior hospital patient whose surgeon failed to timely address her worsening symptoms, resulting in her death.

$250,000 to young man whose physician failed to diagnose an impending torsion testicle, causing the loss of the affected testicle.

$200,000 to young mother whose OB/GYN failed to timely diagnose and treat her ectopic pregnancy, resulting in excruciating, long-term pain and the need for surgery to address the ectopic pregnancy once it was diagnosed.

Menu